When WikiLeaks recently released hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in late July, few reporters expected to find anything related to legalized marijuana. Most were digging through the tens of thousands of correspondences looking for evidence of a rigged system during the Democratic primaries that seemed to favor Ms. Hillary Clinton over Mr. Bernie Sanders. But one industrious blogger from the Marijuana.com website uncovered so much more.
Currently, there are twenty-five states along with the District of Columbia that have legalized marijuana for medical use. Four of these have also legalized cannabis for recreational use, and an additional six states are voting on similar referendums this fall. And even though the District of Columbia, our nation’s capital, is currently legalizing weed, the debate in Congress over possibly issuing federal legislation either “for” or “against” remains heated.
So, when blogger Tom Angell discovered a chain of emails discussing the issue of “marijuana-impaired driving,” he was understandably surprised. Contained in the emails was a reference to the May 24, 2016 edition of a newsletter named Huddle whose membership is exclusive to high ranking elected officials and certain worthy Beltway insiders. Inside the Huddle newsletter was a paid advertisement, just like newsletters tend to have, but this one was from the Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of America (WSWA).
Aside from state-listed irregularities contained in the advertisement, the WSWA is claiming that legalized weed is leading to more automobile fatalities in Colorado. However, while current data shows a slight increase in Colorado driving offenses overall, these numbers are consistent with the increase that is appearing nationwide, whether the state has legalized pot or not.
(Related Article: LEGALIZED MARIJUANA: AN UNLIKELY MENTOR IN THE WAR ON VAPING?)
Furthermore, the WSWA advertisement does not mention a rather groundbreaking 2011 study by two college professors from Montana State University and the University of Colorado which seems to prove a reduction in traffic fatalities in states with legalized marijuana. In fact, the WSWA claims the exact opposite.
The vaping community has grown accustomed to this sort of false advertising. The Internet and television media are always making accusations that e-cigs and vaping leads to teen smoking, heart disease, and a whole host of other nonsense. We’ve been accused of putting formaldehyde in our e-juices and using specially chosen brand names designed to attract children.
There have been stories of “popcorn lung” and “vaper’s tongue,” all of which are total and outright lies. And just like those two college professors from Montana and Colorado, the FDA continues to ignore relevant scientific research from such highly regarded intuitions as the UK’s Royal College of Physicians which claims that vaping is 95% safe than smoking.
(Related Article: CDC LIES ABOUT VAPING; SAYS NO CHANGE IN ‘YOUTH TOBACCO USE SINCE 2011’)
As many vapers already know, e-cigs and vaping have taken a huge chunk out of the profits of Big Tobacco. And as several reputable studies have already proven, the legalization of medical marijuana isn’t doing any favors for the Tobacco Industry either. According to a recent article in the Christian Science Monitor, the use of marijuana “has doubled in the United States in the last three years and is on track to overtake the now-declining number of tobacco users” within the next five years or less.
This series of WikiLeaks emails involving the alcohol and legalized marijuana industries somehow, unwittingly, seems to directly benefit Big Tobacco once the dots are connected.. And as the vaping industry is well aware, the newly announced FDA deeming regulations of May 5, 2016 stand to produce yet another financial windfall for Big Tobacco, as well…by wiping out the entire vaping industry as we know it. The political tentacles of Big Tobacco are seemingly stronger and more powerful than we might have ever imagined.
Share this post
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author's and do not necessarily represent the viewpoints, policy or company position of Vapes.com, the rest of our staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.